9 Best Pluralsight Flow Alternatives & Competitors for Engineering Leaders in 2025

Pluralsight Flow* is a well-known engineering intelligence platform designed to help teams improve their workflows and collaboration by looking at key engineering metrics. While Flow has garnered a robust set of customers over the past several years, some might wonder if reporting will improve or if they need to look at the bigger picture of engineering work.

If you’re an existing or prospective Flow customer considering other options, read on for information on nine Pluralsight Flow alternatives and competitors.

What Is Pluralsight Flow?

Pluralsight Flow aims to help engineering teams deliver software faster and better. It gathers data from tools like GitHub and Jira to track key metrics like cycle time and deployment frequency. With these insights, teams can identify bottlenecks, improve workflows, and make data-driven decisions.

Flow was originally built on the foundation of GitPrime, a Git analytics platform that Pluralsight acquired and turned into a more comprehensive solution.

What Should You Look for in an Alternative to Pluralsight Flow?

Pluralsight Flow primarily concentrates on developer activity and collaboration metrics. Engineering teams looking for a more comprehensive Pluralsight Flow alternative might consider platforms and tools that offer the following features and functionalities:

Robust Data and Integration Capabilities

The more information you have, the easier it is to make critical decisions. Look for tools that can integrate multiple rich sources of data so you’re getting the most accurate view of engineering work possible. Consider the following:

• Broad VCS Support: Look beyond GitHub and ensure compatibility with GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, and other platforms your dev team might use.
• Project Management Tool Integration: Seamless integration with tools like Jira, Asana, or similar platforms provides a complete picture of your team’s work, not just code commits.
• Accurate Data Capture: The tool should precisely track important KPIs and DORA metrics, as well as additional metrics like code churn, pull request size, review time, and merges. Inaccurate data can lead to flawed insights and decisions.
• Customization: Tailoring data capture and reporting to your software engineering team’s specific workflow is crucial for getting the most relevant insights.

Actionable Insights and Reporting

Having data is one thing – acting on it is another. Look for features that make data actionable, such as the following:

• Clear Visualizations: Dashboards should be intuitive and easy to understand, using clear charts and graphs to highlight key trends and potential issues.
• Drill-Down Capability: Look for tools that show both high-level summaries and detailed views of specific projects, teams, or developers.
• Customizable Reports: Generate reports tailored to different audiences and stakeholders, such as managers, executives, and developers, with the specific metrics they care about most.
• Alerts and Notifications: Receive timely notifications of potential bottlenecks, delays, or other issues that require your attention.

Developer Experience Tools

Your platforms and tools should empower team members, not make them feel overly monitored. Look for tools and features that focus on overall team performance and improvement, not individual “scores” that can create unnecessary pressure. Consider the following:

• Contextualized Data: Metrics should be presented with context, such as project complexity and deadlines. This helps avoid unfair comparisons, misaligned expectations, and even developer burnout.
• Actionable Recommendations: Instead of simply highlighting problems, look for a tool that offers concrete suggestions for improving workflow, collaboration, and code quality.

Automation and Workflow Enhancement

As the pace of development increases, automations and process improvements can go a long way. Consider the following features to help streamline workflows for your team:

• Automated Code Review: Features like auto-generated code suggestions can significantly speed up code reviews and ensure greater consistency across your codebase.
• Workflow Bottleneck Identification: Identify slowdowns in the development process, such as long pull request queues or delayed reviews.
• Process Improvement Recommendations: The tool should provide data-backed suggestions for optimizing your team’s workflow and improving efficiency.

Pricing and Value

If you’re a small team or operating with a strict budget, look out for the following pricing options:

• Transparent Pricing: Look for clear and predictable pricing that scales with your team’s size and needs, without hidden fees or surprises.
• Free Trial or Demos: Test the tool thoroughly before committing to a subscription so you know it meets your team’s requirements.
• Consider Total Cost of Ownership: Factor in setup time, training, and ongoing maintenance when evaluating the overall cost and value of the tool.

The 9 Best Pluralsight Flow Alternatives for Engineering Teams

1. Jellyfish
2. LinearB
3. Waydev
4. Code Climate Velocity
5. GitClear
6. Swarmia
7. CloudBees
8. HayStack
9. Allstacks

1. Jellyfish

Jellyfish is an engineering management platform that provides visibility into engineering work and helps organizations align their development efforts with business priorities. It does this by analyzing data from various sources like Git repositories, project management tools, and communication platforms to provide valuable insights into how engineering teams spend their time and what they are working on.

Key Features of Jellyfish

• Business Alignment: Ensure teams are focused on the right work and communicate impact.
• People Management: Guide one-on-ones, advocate for promotions with data, and celebrate team members.
• Predictable Delivery: See what’s on track and what’s at risk, and take action to keep everything on schedule.
• Developer Experience: Uncover issues impacting productivity with qualitative team insights.
• Capacity Planning: Create achievable plans based on historical capacity and performance data.
• Software Capitalization: Get auditable reports on software capitalization without manual tracking.
• Team Operations: Track key metrics in one place to eliminate bottlenecks and increase efficiency.
• GenAI Impact: Quantify GenAI coding tool adoption, usage, and impact on efficiency.

Why Do Companies Choose Jellyfish Over Pluralsight Flow?

Compared to Pluralsight Flow — Jellyfish stands out due to its more holistic view of the engineering organization and how work ladders up to business goals. For example, with Jellyfish engineering leader can leverage:

• Stronger Focus on Strategic Alignment: Jellyfish connects engineering work with actual business goals. It helps visualize how engineering resources are allocated across different initiatives and whether those align with the company’s overall strategy. Flow, while providing data on work distribution, caters to optimizing the development process
• Deeper Insights into Engineering Investment: Jellyfish provides a clearer picture of how engineering resources are invested across different areas like new product development, maintenance, and infrastructure. This granular view helps companies make informed decisions about resource allocation and future investments.
• Emphasis on Higher-Level Management: Jellyfish fits a broad audience, including executives and engineering leaders, by offering insights into overall engineering efficiency and its impact on business outcomes. Flow, while valuable for engineering managers, might be less appealing to those seeking a higher-level overview.
• More Comprehensive Data Sources: While both tools integrate with Git and project management tools, Jellyfish often aggregates data from a wider range of sources, including communication platforms and HR systems, to provide a more holistic view of engineering operations.
• Focus on Work Allocation and Distribution: Jellyfish emphasizes understanding how engineering effort is distributed across different types of work. This helps identify potential imbalances and optimize resource allocation for maximum impact.

2. LinearB

LinearB is a developer workflow optimization platform that helps engineering teams improve efficiency and predictability by providing data-driven insights into their development process. It aims to help teams identify and address bottlenecks, improve collaboration, and deliver software faster.

Key Features

• Connects to your Git provider and project management tools to provide a holistic view of your development process.
• Uses machine learning to identify bottlenecks and provide actionable recommendations for improvement.
• Tracks key metrics like cycle time, deployment frequency, and code churn to help you measure progress and identify areas for improvement.
• Provides real-time visibility into project status and team performance.
• Offers customizable dashboards and reports to help you track the metrics that matter most to your team.

What Are Some Limitations of LinearB?

• Users would like broader integrations.
• Set-up and onboarding can be time-intensive.
• Reporting for C-level executives could be better.

Pricing

LinearB offers three tiers of pricing:

• Free: $0/month to track DORA metrics.
• Business: $49/month/contributor.
• Enterprise: Inquire for custom pricing.

3. Waydev

Waydev is a Git analytics platform that provides insights into engineering performance and helps teams improve their development process. It focuses on data-driven insights to help managers and engineers understand how their work is progressing and to identify areas for improvement.

Key Features

• Tracks key metrics like code churn, pull request size, and review time.
• Provides insights into individual developer performance and team productivity.
• Offers customizable dashboards and reports to help you track the metrics that matter most.
• Integrates with popular project management tools like Jira and Azure DevOps.
• Helps identify potential bottlenecks and areas for improvement in your development process.

What Are Some Limitations of Waydev?

• Some users would like more documentation and tutorials on getting started.
• The platform can be pricey for midsize companies.
• Some users would like the ability to further customize dashboards.

Pricing

Waydev’s plans are billed annually. Teams can choose between:

• Pro: $24.91/month/contributor. Includes up to 50 repositories.
• Premium: $45.75/month/contributor. Includes up to 300 repositories.
• Enterprise: Inquire for pricing. Unlimited repositories.

4. Code Climate Velocity

Code Climate Velocity is an engineering intelligence platform that helps teams improve their performance by providing data-driven insights into the development process. It focuses on helping teams identify and address bottlenecks, improve collaboration, and deliver software faster.

Key Features

• Tracks key metrics like cycle time, deployment frequency, and code churn.
• Provides insights into team performance and identifies areas for improvement.
• Offers customizable dashboards and reports to help you track important metrics for your team.
• Integrates with popular Git providers and project management
• Helps you measure the impact of process changes on your development workflow.

What Are Some Limitations of Code Climate Velocity?

• Additional metrics, such as code complexity, could be helpful.
• Some users would like more customization options.
• Users wish there was a better way for metrics to account for PTO, training, holidays, etc.

Pricing

Code Climate Velocity offers a 14-day free trial for its team tier, as well as affordable options for small teams.

• Open Source: Free.
• Startup: $0, up to four seats.
• Team: $16.67/month/seat if billed annually.

5. GitClear

GitClear is a software development analytics tool that helps teams improve code review efficiency and code quality. It focuses on providing detailed insights into code changes and the code review process.

Key Features

• Provides a visual representation of code changes to make code review faster and easier.
• Helps identify code review bottlenecks and areas for improvement.
• Tracks code churn, code ownership, and other key metrics to help you understand your codebase.
• Offers integrations with popular Git providers like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket.
• Provides tools to help you measure the impact of code changes on your codebase.

What Are Some Limitations of GitClear?

• The user interface is not always intuitive.
• It sometimes feels buggy.
• Additional integrations would be helpful.

Pricing

GitClear offers several pricing options based on team size. Users are not bound to an annual contract and may start with a 15-day free trial.

• Starter: Free for personal use.
• Pro: $14.95/month/contributor, up to 25 repositories.
• Elite: $24.95/month/contributor, up to 250 repositories.
• Enterprise: $34.95/month/contributor, unlimited repositories.

6. Swarmia

Swarmia is a developer productivity platform that helps teams improve their workflow and collaboration. It focuses on helping teams work together more effectively and efficiently.

Key Features

• Provides tools to help you track work in progress, identify bottlenecks, and improve your workflow.
• Offers real-time insights into team performance and project progress.
• Integrates with popular communication tools like Slack to provide contextual information and updates.
• Helps you improve code review efficiency and reduce cycle time.
• Provides tools to help you foster a culture of continuous improvement.

What Are Some Limitations of Swarmia?

• A better breakdown between types of work could clarify how effort is spent.
• Some users want more control over how they filter or view different metrics.
• There aren’t enough integration options for some users.

Pricing

Swarmia offers a free plan for companies with up to nine developers. Teams that invest in the “Standard” plan gain access to all three modules (Business outcomes, developer productivity, developer experience) for $39/month/developer. Alternatively, users can choose a single module for $20/month/developer.

7. CloudBees

CloudBees is a DevOps platform that provides a wide range of tools and services to help organizations accelerate their software delivery process. While not solely focused on developer analytics, it offers features that can provide insights into your development process.

Key Features

• Provides a continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) platform to automate your software delivery pipeline.
• Offers tools for managing and deploying applications to various environments.
• Provides features for monitoring and managing your applications in production.
• Includes features for collaboration and communication within your development team.
• Offers integrations with various tools and technologies commonly used in software development.

What Are Some Limitations of CloudBees?

• The platform can have a steep learning curve.
• Some users feel the UI is a bit dated.
• There are mixed reviews on CloudBees’ documentation.

Pricing

CloudBees is free for up to five users. From there, CloudBees is $30/month/user for up to 25 developers. Larger teams should inquire about custom pricing.

8. Haystack

Haystack is an engineering analytics platform that helps software teams improve their development process by identifying and addressing bottlenecks. It focuses on providing actionable insights to help you optimize your workflow and deliver software faster.

Key Features

• Tracks key metrics like cycle time, deployment frequency, and code churn.
• Provides insights into team performance and identifies areas for improvement.
• Offers customizable dashboards and reports to help you track high-priority metrics.
• Integrates with popular Git providers and project management
• Helps you measure the impact of process changes on your development workflow.

What Are Some Limitations of Haystack?

• Some users aren’t sure how to make data actionable.
• Historically, there have been some performance issues.
• Some people note they’re waiting for more features.

Pricing

Haystack offers two pricing tiers: The Growth tier at $20/month/member for teams of 100 or less, or the Enterprise tier, with custom pricing. Users can try the Growth tier with a 14-day free trial.

9. Allstacks

AllStacks considers itself a software engineering intelligence platform. Its goal is to empower engineering teams to view project health, align with business objectives, commit to goals, and more. It uses machine learning to analyze data from your development process and predict potential risks and delays.

Key Features

• Predicts potential risks and delays in your software projects.
• Provides insights into the factors that are impacting your project timelines.
• Helps you improve your forecasting accuracy and reduce the risk of project delays.
• Integrates with popular Git providers and project management
• Offers customizable dashboards and reports to help you track your project progress and identify potential risks.

What Are Some Limitations of Allstacks?

• Some users find that tools and features are not as advanced as other platforms.
• Data could be synchronized more frequently.
• Setting up new users can be clunky.

Pricing

Pricing for Allstacks is based on the number of contributors. Teams can contact Allstacks for a free trial or tack on a software capitalization tool for an additional $200/contributor/year.

• Premium: $400/contributor/year, for up to 500 users.
• Enterprise: $650/contributor/year, for unlimited users.

Jellyfish — The #1 Pluralsight Flow Alternative

Engineering metrics are only one small piece of the puzzle when it comes to measuring engineering success. That’s why Jellyfish is a great alternative to Pluralsight Flow: It considers the whole picture, from engineering performance to the developer experience and whether work aligns with business priorities.

Ready to make the switch to a more robust engineering management platform? Get a Jellyfish demo here.

*As of February 5, 2025, Pluralsight Flow was acquired by Appfire.